ThinkWithPrompt by SynotticThinkWithPrompt

Analyze campaign performance and ROI

Turns ad, email, PR, or campaign data into results, insights, and next steps.

Marketing & BrandRCTFVVAdvancedMarketingSalesData & AnalyticsAnalyze

The prompt

Role: Act as a marketing director writing a post-campaign performance review. Context: Campaign objective and target: [OBJECTIVE_TARGET]. Spend: [SPEND]. Results data by channel (impressions, clicks, leads, conversions, revenue/pipeline): [RESULTS_DATA]. Benchmarks / prior campaign: [BENCHMARKS]. Attribution model used: [ATTRIBUTION]. Known caveats: [CAVEATS]. Task: Produce: performance vs target overall and by channel; efficiency metrics (CPL, CPA, ROAS or pipeline-to-spend); the 3 factors that most explain the outcome; what worked and what to stop; and 3 recommendations for the next campaign with expected effect. Format: Sections: Headline result | Channel breakdown (table) | Efficiency metrics | Drivers | Keep/stop/change | Recommendations. ~500 words. Verification: Recompute the efficiency metrics from the raw numbers and show the formulas. State how the attribution model and caveats limit the conclusions. Validation: Challenge the read as a sceptical CFO: is the ROI claim defensible given the attribution model, or overstated? Adjust the framing.

Highlighted [brackets] are blanks to replace with your own details.

Fill in the blanks and use this promptMore Marketing & Brand prompts

What to fill in

  • OBJECTIVE_TARGET
  • SPEND
  • RESULTS_DATA
  • BENCHMARKS
  • ATTRIBUTION
  • CAVEATS

How this prompt is built

This prompt follows the RCTFVV structure (Role, Context, Task, Format, Verification, Validation). RCTFVV extends RCTF with two checking steps. Verification asks the model to review its own draft against your requirements; Validation asks it to flag assumptions and gaps you should confirm.

Related prompts

Find more prompts like this