Write the discussion and limitations section of my paper
Drafts a discussion that interprets results honestly, connects them to prior work, and states limitations without undermining the paper.
The prompt
Help me write the discussion section of my paper.
Research question and hypotheses: [DETAILS]
Main results: [PASTE key findings with numbers]
Prior work my results agree or disagree with: [PAPERS and what they found]
Design and data limitations I know of: [DETAILS]
Implications I see: [for theory, practice, policy]
Word limit: [NUMBER]
Structure:
1. Open with a direct answer to the research question in 2-3 sentences.
2. Interpret each main finding: what it means, how it compares with prior work, and plausible explanations, including alternatives to my preferred one.
3. Unexpected or null results: discuss them, do not bury them.
4. Limitations: for each, state its likely direction and size of impact on the conclusions, and what was done to reduce it. Be specific, not boilerplate.
5. Implications, scaled to the strength of the evidence (no causal claims from correlational data, no generalizing beyond the sample).
6. Future research: 2-3 specific next studies, not "more research is needed".
7. A concise conclusion paragraph.
Only cite papers I listed; mark other needed support as [CITE]. After the draft, list any sentence where the claim goes beyond the results.
Highlighted [brackets] are blanks to replace with your own details.
Fill in the blanks and use this promptMore Writing & Editing prompts
What to fill in
- DETAILS
- PASTE key findings with numbers
- PAPERS and what they found
- for theory, practice, policy
- NUMBER
- CITE
How this prompt is built
This prompt follows the RTF structure (Role, Task, Format). RTF tells the model who to be, what to do and what shape the answer should take. It is the quickest structure that still gives noticeably better results than a bare request.
Related prompts
- Write a paper or conference abstract within the word limitA tight, structured abstract that states the problem, method, key result with numbers, and implication without exceeding the limit.
- Write a news analysis article that connects the dotsAn analysis piece that explains a current story by linking it to history, data, and similar events, with every claim sourced.
- Write a methods section another researcher could replicateTurns my notes into a complete methods section another researcher could replicate, with gaps flagged.
- Teach AI to write in my personal styleAnalyzes samples of your writing and produces a reusable style guide, then writes in that voice.