Slice an epic into small releasable increments
Thin vertical slices that each deliver user value and can ship independently, with a sensible release order.
The prompt
Break this epic into small, independently releasable slices.
Epic: [DESCRIPTION AND GOAL]
Users and main workflow: [WHO DOES WHAT]
Full scope as currently imagined: [LIST]
Constraints: [DEADLINE, TEAM SIZE, TECH LIMITS]
What we most need to learn early: [RISKIEST ASSUMPTION]
Rules for slicing:
- Slice vertically: each slice works end to end for a user (UI, logic, data), not by technical layer.
- Each slice is shippable (behind a flag if needed) and fits in a sprint or less.
- Use slicing patterns where they help: happy path first, one user type first, manual before automated, one platform or integration first, simple rules before complex ones, read-only before edit.
- The first slice should test the riskiest assumption or deliver the core value with the least work.
Return:
1. A table: Slice | User value delivered | What is deliberately left out | Pattern used | Relative size (S/M/L).
2. A recommended release order with the reason for the order.
3. The minimum set of slices that would let us call the epic useful.
4. A user story with acceptance criteria for the first slice.
5. Any slice that is still too big, with a suggestion to split it further.
Highlighted [brackets] are blanks to replace with your own details.
Fill in the blanks and use this promptMore Product & UX Design prompts
What to fill in
- DESCRIPTION AND GOAL
- WHO DOES WHAT
- LIST
- DEADLINE, TEAM SIZE, TECH LIMITS
- RISKIEST ASSUMPTION
How this prompt is built
This prompt follows the RTF structure (Role, Task, Format). RTF tells the model who to be, what to do and what shape the answer should take. It is the quickest structure that still gives noticeably better results than a bare request.
Related prompts
- Run customer discovery interviews that reveal the truthInterview questions about past behavior (not opinions) that validate problems without leading the witness.
- Review a design or app for usability problemsA heuristic UX review with prioritized issues and fixes.
- Audit a website or app for accessibility (WCAG)Checks against WCAG and gives prioritized, specific fixes.
- Design a UI screen or prototypeLayouts, components, copy, and states for a screen or prototype, with design rationale.