ThinkWithPrompt by SynotticThinkWithPrompt

Check my marketing copy for claims that need proof or disclosure

A pre-publication review that flags risky claims, testimonials, and missing disclosures in marketing copy.

Legal & ComplianceFew-ShotStandardLegalMarketingFinanceAnalyze

The prompt

Review my marketing copy for claims that could cause legal, regulatory, or trust problems. Copy: [PASTE] Product and industry: [WHAT, and whether it's regulated - e.g. health, finance, supplements, alcohol, kids] Market(s): [e.g. US, UK, EU] Evidence I have: [STUDIES, DATA, CUSTOMER RESULTS] Influencer, affiliate, or testimonial content: [yes/no and details] Flag and explain: 1. Objective claims needing substantiation (numbers, "fastest", "clinically proven", "#1"). 2. Comparative claims about competitors. 3. Testimonials and results: are they typical, real, and disclosed if paid or incentivized? 4. Missing disclosures: material connections, #ad, pricing conditions, free trial terms, auto-renewal. 5. Words that are restricted in my industry (e.g. health or financial guarantees, "risk-free"). 6. Environmental claims ("eco-friendly", "carbon neutral"). 7. Use of trademarks, images of real people, or copyrighted material. Return a table: | Claim (quoted) | Risk level | Why | Evidence needed | Safer rewrite | Then a cleaned-up version of the copy. This is general information, not legal advice. Have a qualified lawyer or compliance team review regulated or high-stakes claims before publishing.

Highlighted [brackets] are blanks to replace with your own details.

Fill in the blanks and use this promptMore Legal & Compliance prompts

What to fill in

  • PASTE
  • e.g. US, UK, EU
  • STUDIES, DATA, CUSTOMER RESULTS
  • yes/no and details

How this prompt is built

This prompt follows the Few-Shot structure (Few-shot prompting). A few-shot prompt includes one or more worked examples of the input and the output you want, so the model can copy the pattern instead of guessing it.

Related prompts

Find more prompts like this