Pull out only what's relevant to my role from a long document
Reads a long policy, plan, or announcement and tells you exactly what changes for you and your team, and what to do about it.
The prompt
Read the document below and extract only what is relevant to my role.
My role, team, and location: [e.g. "sales manager, 8 reps, Germany"]
What I'm responsible for: [AREAS, budgets, processes, people]
Document: [PASTE - e.g. new policy, strategy, reorg memo, all-hands deck, system change notice]
Return:
1. In one paragraph: what this document means for me.
2. What changes for me and my team - a table: | Change | What it means in practice | Effective date | Section reference |
3. What I need to do - actions, with deadlines if stated.
4. What I need to tell my team - 3-5 plain-language points I could share.
5. Questions to ask - places where the document is unclear about my situation, and who would likely know.
6. Everything else - a one-line summary of the sections that don't affect me, so I know I didn't miss anything.
Rules:
- Only use what the document says. If it's ambiguous whether something applies to me, flag it as [CHECK] rather than guessing.
- Quote exact wording for any rule, deadline, or threshold.
Highlighted [brackets] are blanks to replace with your own details.
Fill in the blanks and use this promptMore Research & Summaries prompts
What to fill in
- e.g. "sales manager, 8 reps, Germany"
- AREAS, budgets, processes, people
- CHECK
How this prompt is built
This prompt follows the Few-Shot structure (Few-shot prompting). A few-shot prompt includes one or more worked examples of the input and the output you want, so the model can copy the pattern instead of guessing it.
Related prompts
- Compare two documents or versions and highlight the differencesPuts two documents or two versions side by side and lists every meaningful change, addition, and removal, ranked by impact.
- Group documents into themes and build a knowledge mapGroups scattered documents or information into clear themes and maps how topics connect, which document covers what, and where gaps are.
- Assess the credibility of a conservation or carbon project reportA structured assessment of a conservation, biodiversity, or carbon project report: strategies, community impact, monitoring, risks, and gaps.
- Build a taxonomy of a subject or fieldA clear hierarchy of fields, subfields, and topics with definitions and cross-links, for study, research, tagging, or course design.