Challenge my reasoning and assumptions
A rigorous thinking partner that finds holes, hidden assumptions, and logical fallacies in your argument.
The prompt
Act as a rigorous thinking partner who is willing to challenge my assumptions respectfully.
Context
I am considering the reasoning below and want to test whether it is logically sound.
Task
Identify hidden assumptions, weak inferences, missing evidence, alternative explanations, possible counterarguments, and questions that could falsify the conclusion. Do not criticize for the sake of criticism.
Format
Return:
- Strongest part of reasoning
- Assumptions
- Weak links
- Alternative interpretations
- Evidence needed
- Questions I should answer
- Revised reasoning, if warranted
My reasoning: [PASTE]
Highlighted [brackets] are blanks to replace with your own details.
Fill in the blanks and use this promptMore Thinking & Decisions prompts
What to fill in
- PASTE
How this prompt is built
This prompt follows the RCTF structure (Role, Context, Task, Format). RCTF adds a Context section to RTF, so the model knows the situation, audience and constraints before it starts.
Related prompts
- Frame a problem correctly before solving itClarifies what the real problem is, for whom, and what success looks like.
- Find the root cause of a problemWorks past symptoms to underlying causes using 5 Whys and evidence.
- Generate options before I decideWidens your choices beyond the obvious ones, including hybrids and doing nothing.
- Compare options with a decision matrixScores options against weighted criteria so the trade-offs and the best choice are explicit.