ThinkWithPrompt by SynotticThinkWithPrompt

Write a point-by-point response to peer reviewers

Turns reviewer comments into a courteous, organized response letter with a tracked plan for every revision.

Writing & EditingFew-ShotStandardWriteRewrite & EditFill-in Template

The prompt

Help me write a point-by-point response to the reviewers of my manuscript. Journal and decision: [e.g. "major revision, resubmit within 60 days"] Reviewer and editor comments: [PASTE all comments, labeled by reviewer] Changes I have made or plan to make: [NOTES per comment, with page/line numbers if known] Comments I disagree with, and why: [YOUR REASONING and any evidence] Word or page limits that constrain changes: [DETAILS or "none"] Steps: 1. Split every comment into separate, numbered points (R1.1, R1.2, R2.1...). Do not merge or skip any, including minor ones. 2. Classify each: required change / reasonable request / misunderstanding / out of scope / disagreement. 3. For each point, draft a response that thanks briefly (once, not every time), states exactly what changed, and quotes the revised text with its location. Mark anything I have not done yet as [TO DO]. 4. For disagreements, respond respectfully with reasoning and evidence, and offer a partial concession where possible (e.g. a new limitation sentence). 5. Flag where two reviewers ask for conflicting changes and suggest how to reconcile them for the editor. Return: - A short cover note to the editor summarizing the main changes. - The response letter: Comment (quoted) | Response | Change made and location. - A revision checklist of every [TO DO], ordered by effort. Never invent analyses, results, or citations I have not provided; mark them [ADD] instead.

Highlighted [brackets] are blanks to replace with your own details.

Fill in the blanks and use this promptMore Writing & Editing prompts

What to fill in

  • e.g. "major revision, resubmit within 60 days"
  • PASTE all comments, labeled by reviewer
  • NOTES per comment, with page/line numbers if known
  • YOUR REASONING and any evidence
  • DETAILS or "none"
  • TO DO
  • ADD

How this prompt is built

This prompt follows the Few-Shot structure (Few-shot prompting). A few-shot prompt includes one or more worked examples of the input and the output you want, so the model can copy the pattern instead of guessing it.

Related prompts

Find more prompts like this