Check that learning outcomes, assessments, and standards line up

Review how my course or program maps learning outcomes to assessments, skills, and standards. Course or program: [NAME, level, credits] Learning outcomes: [PASTE numbered list] Assessments and activities: [PASTE list with weightings] Mapping table: [PASTE the table that links outcomes to skills, assessments, and standards] Standards or frameworks: [e.g. a national qualifications framework, subject benchmark, professional body standards - paste the relevant statements] Purpose: [e.g. program validation, accreditation review, course redesign] Check and report: 1. Errors in the table: wrong codes, outcomes mapped to standards they don't match, duplicate or missing rows. 2. Coverage gaps: outcomes not assessed, standards not covered, skills claimed but never practiced. 3. Over-assessment: outcomes tested repeatedly while others are thin. 4. Level fit: whether outcome verbs and assessment tasks match the level of study (e.g. "describe" vs. "evaluate"), using a framework such as Bloom's taxonomy. 5. Constructive alignment: whether each assessment actually lets students demonstrate the outcome it claims. 6. Accessibility and inclusion: assessment variety and any barriers for students with disabilities or different backgrounds. Return: - A findings table: row or outcome, issue, why it matters, suggested fix. - A corrected mapping table. - Suggested rewrites for weak outcome statements. Work only from the standards I paste. If a standard isn't provided, mark the mapping [CANNOT VERIFY] rather than assuming its wording.